<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Auto-Follow Good or Bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hallicious.com/2009/05/is-twitter-auto-follow-good-or-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hallicious.com/2009/05/is-twitter-auto-follow-good-or-bad/</link>
	<description>more bounce to the ounce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:46:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Do You Really Know Who You&#8217;re Following? — hallicious</title>
		<link>http://www.hallicious.com/2009/05/is-twitter-auto-follow-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Really Know Who You&#8217;re Following? — hallicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 05:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hallicious.com/?p=53#comment-846</guid>
		<description>[...] Company Magazine this weekend, in print form, and felt compelled to write a follow-up post to my recent question about twitter auto-following being good or bad.  Especially after reading some of the comments in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Company Magazine this weekend, in print form, and felt compelled to write a follow-up post to my recent question about twitter auto-following being good or bad.  Especially after reading some of the comments in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.hallicious.com/2009/05/is-twitter-auto-follow-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hallicious.com/?p=53#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Peter,

I love it. Definitely a debate around this topic. I was thinking about staying in single digits with $9.99 as a price point. ;) The goal would be to sell 1,000 copies... $10k. 

Greg,

I have a follow everyone policy and screen / block after my tweet stream gets filled up with spam by individual users.  To me, its easier that way.

I see the demand for this type of information... and think that some good could come from it with the money going to charity.

-chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>I love it. Definitely a debate around this topic. I was thinking about staying in single digits with $9.99 as a price point. ;) The goal would be to sell 1,000 copies&#8230; $10k. </p>
<p>Greg,</p>
<p>I have a follow everyone policy and screen / block after my tweet stream gets filled up with spam by individual users.  To me, its easier that way.</p>
<p>I see the demand for this type of information&#8230; and think that some good could come from it with the money going to charity.</p>
<p>-chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.hallicious.com/2009/05/is-twitter-auto-follow-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hallicious.com/?p=53#comment-17</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting question.  I think that if your goal is to increase your follower count, and you can do it while generating funds for a worthy cause, go for it!  
In my mind, the real question is why to have a large follower count in the first place . . . who is it you want to reach and why?  That&#039;s why I don&#039;t autofollow, BUT I do spend time every day looking at every person who&#039;s followed me.  And unless they&#039;re spammers or get-rich-quickers, I generally follow them back.
But the people I proactively follow all have the same reason - we share some interest, and I&#039;m likely to be interested in what they say.  And there&#039;s no autofollow that I know of to guarantee that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting question.  I think that if your goal is to increase your follower count, and you can do it while generating funds for a worthy cause, go for it!<br />
In my mind, the real question is why to have a large follower count in the first place . . . who is it you want to reach and why?  That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t autofollow, BUT I do spend time every day looking at every person who&#8217;s followed me.  And unless they&#8217;re spammers or get-rich-quickers, I generally follow them back.<br />
But the people I proactively follow all have the same reason &#8211; we share some interest, and I&#8217;m likely to be interested in what they say.  And there&#8217;s no autofollow that I know of to guarantee that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.hallicious.com/2009/05/is-twitter-auto-follow-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hallicious.com/?p=53#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris

The tit-for-tat approach is certainly in vogue with spammers right now.  Lots of static being generated.

I&#039;ll steer clear of your Machiavellian question; perhaps you should address &quot;what is a fair price?&quot; next... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris</p>
<p>The tit-for-tat approach is certainly in vogue with spammers right now.  Lots of static being generated.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll steer clear of your Machiavellian question; perhaps you should address &#8220;what is a fair price?&#8221; next&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
